与之前的版本一样,Android 14 包含一些行为变更,这些变更可能会影响您的应用。以下行为变更仅影响以 Android 14(API 级别 34)或更高版本为目标平台的应用。如果您的应用以 Android 14 或更高版本为目标平台,您应该修改自己的应用以适当地支持这些行为(如果适用)。
请务必查看对 Android 14 上运行的所有应用都有影响的行为变更列表(无论应用的 targetSdkVersion
如何)。
核心功能
前台服务类型是必填项
如果您的应用以 Android 14(API 级别 34)或更高版本为目标平台,则必须为应用中的每项前台服务指定至少一个前台服务类型。您应该选择一个能够代表应用用例的前台服务类型。系统需要特定类型的前台服务满足特定用例。
如果应用中的用例与这些类型均不相关,强烈建议您迁移逻辑以使用 WorkManager 或用户发起的数据传输作业。
在 BluetoothAdapter 中强制执行 BLUETOOTH_CONNECT 权限
Android 14 enforces the BLUETOOTH_CONNECT
permission when calling the
BluetoothAdapter
getProfileConnectionState()
method for apps targeting
Android 14 (API level 34) or higher.
This method already required the BLUETOOTH_CONNECT
permission, but it was not
enforced. Make sure your app declares BLUETOOTH_CONNECT
in your app's
AndroidManifest.xml
file as shown in the following snippet and check that
a user has granted the permission before calling
getProfileConnectionState
.
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.BLUETOOTH_CONNECT" />
OpenJDK 17 更新
Android 14 continues the work of refreshing Android's core libraries to align with the features in the latest OpenJDK LTS releases, including both library updates and Java 17 language support for app and platform developers.
A few of these changes can affect app compatibility:
- Changes to regular expressions: Invalid group references are now
disallowed to more closely follow the semantics of OpenJDK. You might see
new cases where an
IllegalArgumentException
is thrown by thejava.util.regex.Matcher
class, so make sure to test your app for areas that use regular expressions. To enable or disable this change while testing, toggle theDISALLOW_INVALID_GROUP_REFERENCE
flag using the compatibility framework tools. - UUID handling: The
java.util.UUID.fromString()
method now does more strict checks when validating the input argument, so you might see anIllegalArgumentException
during deserialization. To enable or disable this change while testing, toggle theENABLE_STRICT_VALIDATION
flag using the compatibility framework tools. - ProGuard issues: In some cases, the addition of the
java.lang.ClassValue
class causes an issue if you try to shrink, obfuscate, and optimize your app using ProGuard. The problem originates with a Kotlin library that changes runtime behaviour based on whetherClass.forName("java.lang.ClassValue")
returns a class or not. If your app was developed against an older version of the runtime without thejava.lang.ClassValue
class available, then these optimizations might remove thecomputeValue
method from classes derived fromjava.lang.ClassValue
.
JobScheduler 强化了回调和网络行为
Since its introduction, JobScheduler expects your app to return from
onStartJob
or onStopJob
within a few seconds. Prior to Android 14,
if a job runs too long, the job is stopped and fails silently.
If your app targets Android 14 (API level 34) or higher and
exceeds the granted time on the main thread, the app triggers an ANR
with the error message "No response to onStartJob
" or
"No response to onStopJob
".
This ANR may be a result of 2 scenarios:
1. There is work blocking the main thread, preventing the callbacks onStartJob
or onStopJob
from executing and completing within the expected time limit.
2. The developer is running blocking work within the JobScheduler
callback onStartJob
or onStopJob
, preventing the callback from
completing within the expected time limit.
To address #1, you will need to further debug what is blocking the main thread
when the ANR occurs, you can do this using
ApplicationExitInfo#getTraceInputStream()
to get the tombstone
trace when the ANR occurs. If you're able to manually reproduce the ANR,
you can record a system trace and inspect the trace using either
Android Studio or Perfetto to better understand what is running on
the main thread when the ANR occurs.
Note that this can happen when using JobScheduler API directly
or using the androidx library WorkManager.
To address #2, consider migrating to WorkManager, which provides
support for wrapping any processing in onStartJob
or onStopJob
in an asynchronous thread.
JobScheduler
also introduces a requirement to declare the
ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE
permission if using setRequiredNetworkType
or
setRequiredNetwork
constraint. If your app does not declare the
ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE
permission when scheduling the job and is targeting
Android 14 or higher, it will result in a SecurityException
.
Tiles 发布 API
对于以 Android 14 及更高版本为目标平台的应用,
TileService#startActivityAndCollapse(Intent)
已弃用,现在会抛出
调用时抛出异常。如果您的应用从功能块启动 activity,请使用
TileService#startActivityAndCollapse(PendingIntent)
。
隐私设置
拥有对照片和视频的部分访问权限
Android 14 引入了所选照片访问权限,可让用户授权应用访问其媒体库中的特定图片和视频,而不是授予对指定类型的所有媒体的访问权限。
仅当您的应用以 Android 14(API 级别 34)或更高版本为目标平台时,才会启用此变更。如果您还没有使用照片选择器,建议您在应用中实现该选择器,以便在选择图片和视频时提供一致的体验,同时还可以加强用户隐私保护,而无需请求任何存储权限。
如果您使用存储权限维护自己的图库选择器,并且需要完全控制您的实现,请调整您的实现,以使用新的 READ_MEDIA_VISUAL_USER_SELECTED
权限。如果您的应用不使用新权限,系统会在兼容模式下运行应用。
用户体验
安全的全屏 intent 通知
With Android 11 (API level 30), it was possible for any app to use
Notification.Builder.setFullScreenIntent
to send full-screen
intents while the phone is locked. You could auto-grant this on app install by
declaring USE_FULL_SCREEN_INTENT
permission in the
AndroidManifest.
Full-screen intent notifications are designed for extremely high-priority
notifications demanding the user's immediate attention, such as an incoming
phone call or alarm clock settings configured by the user. For apps targeting
Android 14 (API level 34) or higher, apps that are allowed to use this
permission are limited to those that provide calling and alarms only. The Google
Play Store revokes default USE_FULL_SCREEN_INTENT
permissions for any apps
that don't fit this profile. The deadline for these policy changes is May 31,
2024.
This permission remains enabled for apps installed on the phone before the user updates to Android 14. Users can turn this permission on and off.
You can use the new API
NotificationManager.canUseFullScreenIntent
to check if your app
has the permission; if not, your app can use the new intent
ACTION_MANAGE_APP_USE_FULL_SCREEN_INTENT
to launch the settings
page where users can grant the permission.
安全
对隐式 intent 和待处理 intent 的限制
For apps targeting Android 14 (API level 34) or higher, Android restricts apps from sending implicit intents to internal app components in the following ways:
- Implicit intents are only delivered to exported components. Apps must either use an explicit intent to deliver to unexported components, or mark the component as exported.
- If an app creates a mutable pending intent with an intent that doesn't specify a component or package, the system throws an exception.
These changes prevent malicious apps from intercepting implicit intents that are intended for use by an app's internal components.
For example, here is an intent filter that could be declared in your app's manifest file:
<activity
android:name=".AppActivity"
android:exported="false">
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="com.example.action.APP_ACTION" />
<category android:name="android.intent.category.DEFAULT" />
</intent-filter>
</activity>
If your app tried to launch this activity using an implicit intent, an
ActivityNotFoundException
exception would be thrown:
Kotlin
// Throws an ActivityNotFoundException exception when targeting Android 14. context.startActivity(Intent("com.example.action.APP_ACTION"))
Java
// Throws an ActivityNotFoundException exception when targeting Android 14. context.startActivity(new Intent("com.example.action.APP_ACTION"));
To launch the non-exported activity, your app should use an explicit intent instead:
Kotlin
// This makes the intent explicit. val explicitIntent = Intent("com.example.action.APP_ACTION") explicitIntent.apply { package = context.packageName } context.startActivity(explicitIntent)
Java
// This makes the intent explicit. Intent explicitIntent = new Intent("com.example.action.APP_ACTION") explicitIntent.setPackage(context.getPackageName()); context.startActivity(explicitIntent);
在运行时注册的广播接收器必须指定导出行为
Apps and services that target Android 14 (API level 34) or higher and use
context-registered receivers are required to specify a flag
to indicate whether or not the receiver should be exported to all other apps on
the device: either RECEIVER_EXPORTED
or RECEIVER_NOT_EXPORTED
, respectively.
This requirement helps protect apps from security vulnerabilities by leveraging
the features for these receivers introduced in Android 13.
Exception for receivers that receive only system broadcasts
If your app is registering a receiver only for
system broadcasts through Context#registerReceiver
methods, such as Context#registerReceiver()
, then it
shouldn't specify a flag when registering the receiver.
更安全的动态代码加载
如果您的应用以 Android 14(API 级别 34)或更高版本为目标平台并使用动态代码 正在加载 (DCL) 功能,则必须将所有动态加载的文件标记为只读。 否则,系统会抛出异常。我们建议应用应避免 动态加载代码 因为这样做会大大增加 可能会遭到代码注入或代码篡改
如果必须动态加载代码,请使用以下方法,在动态文件(例如 DEX、JAR 或 APK 文件)打开并写入任何内容之前立即将其设为只读:
Kotlin
val jar = File("DYNAMICALLY_LOADED_FILE.jar") val os = FileOutputStream(jar) os.use { // Set the file to read-only first to prevent race conditions jar.setReadOnly() // Then write the actual file content } val cl = PathClassLoader(jar, parentClassLoader)
Java
File jar = new File("DYNAMICALLY_LOADED_FILE.jar"); try (FileOutputStream os = new FileOutputStream(jar)) { // Set the file to read-only first to prevent race conditions jar.setReadOnly(); // Then write the actual file content } catch (IOException e) { ... } PathClassLoader cl = new PathClassLoader(jar, parentClassLoader);
处理已存在的动态加载文件
为防止系统对现有动态加载的文件抛出异常,我们建议您先删除并重新创建文件,然后再尝试在应用中重新动态加载这些文件。重新创建文件时,请按照上述指南在写入时将文件标记为只读。或者,您可以将现有文件重新标记为只读,但在这种情况下,我们强烈建议您先验证文件的完整性(例如,对照可信值检查文件的签名)以保护应用免遭恶意操作的影响。
针对从后台启动 activity 的其他限制
对于以 Android 14(API 级别 34)或更高版本为目标平台的应用,系统会进一步限制允许应用在后台启动 activity 的时间:
- 现在,当应用使用
PendingIntent#send()
或类似方法发送PendingIntent
时,如果它想要授予自己的后台 activity 启动待处理 intent 的启动特权,则必须选择启用。如需选择启用,应用应通过setPendingIntentBackgroundActivityStartMode(MODE_BACKGROUND_ACTIVITY_START_ALLOWED)
传递ActivityOptions
软件包。 - 当可见应用绑定了另一个后台应用的服务时
bindService()
方法,可见应用现在必须 如果它想要将自己的后台活动 绑定服务。要选择启用,应用应包含BIND_ALLOW_ACTIVITY_STARTS
标志,在调用bindService()
方法。
这些更改扩大了一组现有限制条件的范围,目的是防止恶意应用滥用 API 以在后台启动干扰性活动,从而保护用户。
压缩路径遍历
For apps targeting Android 14 (API level 34) or higher, Android prevents the Zip
Path Traversal Vulnerability in the following way:
ZipFile(String)
and
ZipInputStream.getNextEntry()
throws a
ZipException
if zip file entry names contain ".." or start
with "/".
Apps can opt-out from this validation by calling
dalvik.system.ZipPathValidator.clearCallback()
.
每次 MediaProjection 捕获会话都需要征得用户同意
For apps targeting Android 14 (API level 34) or higher, a SecurityException
is
thrown by MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay
in either of the following
scenarios:
- Your app caches the
Intent
that is returned fromMediaProjectionManager#createScreenCaptureIntent
, and passes it multiple times toMediaProjectionManager#getMediaProjection
. - Your app invokes
MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay
multiple times on the sameMediaProjection
instance.
Your app must ask the user to give consent before each capture session. A single
capture session is a single invocation on
MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay
, and each MediaProjection
instance must
be used only once.
Handle configuration changes
If your app needs to invoke MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay
to handle
configuration changes (such as the screen orientation or screen size changing),
you can follow these steps to update the VirtualDisplay
for the existing
MediaProjection
instance:
- Invoke
VirtualDisplay#resize
with the new width and height. - Provide a new
Surface
with the new width and height toVirtualDisplay#setSurface
.
Register a callback
Your app should register a callback to handle cases where the user doesn't grant
consent to continue a capture session. To do this, implement
Callback#onStop
and have your app release any related resources (such as
the VirtualDisplay
and Surface
).
If your app doesn't register this callback,
MediaProjection#createVirtualDisplay
throws an IllegalStateException
when your app invokes it.
更新后的非 SDK 限制
Android 14 包含更新后的受限非 SDK 接口列表(基于与 Android 开发者之间的协作以及最新的内部测试)。在限制使用非 SDK 接口之前,我们会尽可能确保有可用的公开替代方案。
如果您的应用并非以 Android 14 为目标平台,其中一些变更可能不会立即对您产生影响。然而,虽然您目前仍可以使用一些非 SDK 接口(具体取决于应用的目标 API 级别),但只要您使用任何非 SDK 方法或字段,终归存在导致应用出问题的显著风险。
如果您不确定自己的应用是否使用了非 SDK 接口,则可以测试您的应用来进行确认。如果您的应用依赖于非 SDK 接口,您应该开始计划迁移到 SDK 替代方案。然而,我们知道某些应用具有使用非 SDK 接口的有效用例。如果您无法为应用中的某项功能找到使用非 SDK 接口的替代方案,应请求新的公共 API。
如需详细了解此 Android 版本中的变更,请参阅 Android 14 中有关限制非 SDK 接口的更新。如需全面了解有关非 SDK 接口的详细信息,请参阅对非 SDK 接口的限制。